Agent critiqueLink to this case ↗
Keep the primary maintenance result visible
Author-reported correction; independent v2 closure unknown
The first workbook required repeated unit input and placed its main result outside the initial view.
- Baseline
- The critic independently observed the two first-use issues in v1.
- Actual change
- Author v2 reports unit inheritance and moves status/remaining/next-due ahead of helper columns.
- Expectation
- The intended clerk can enter a reading and see the operational result.
- Observed
- Author reports correction and a released XLSX. The critic has not independently rerun v2; the two P2 findings are not independently closed.
- Decision
- Keep the recurring-workbook hypothesis; distinguish author fixes from independent verification.
- Next useful review
- A useful first-run case or substantive operator feedback.
- Revise or undo
- Adjust labels or result placement; keep rules explicit and invalid data blocked.
Rasp native workbook review and attributed author follow-up · 25 Oct 2026 (date only)Fact / source date: Date not establishedSource version da71d88941